Virginia Live CLE Bundle 2021

Attorneys should attend this program to gain a clear and timely understanding of the complex regulatory environment surrounding cryptocurrency and digital assets, particularly in light of the significant shifts under the Trump administration. As crypto adoption accelerates, legal practitioners face heightened risks related to enforcement, compliance, and constitutional protections. This program equips attorneys with actionable knowledge to advise clients on regulatory obligations, constitutional challenges, and strategic risk management in a volatile legal landscape.

Attendees will learn about the roles of key federal agencies (SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, IRS) and recent enforcement trends impacting the crypto space. The course will cover emerging constitutional concerns, particularly under the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, as they relate to crypto privacy, speech, and property rights. Special attention will be paid to evolving developments under the Trump administration, including federal crypto reserve policy, rollback of enforcement teams, stablecoin legislation, and deregulation of banking services. Participants will also gain practical insights into crypto compliance strategies and litigation risk.

This program is ideal for attorneys who represent clients in fintech, cryptocurrency, blockchain, and Web3 industries, as well as those working in financial regulation, constitutional law, white-collar defense, and compliance. It is also highly beneficial for in-house counsel, regulatory advisors, and policy professionals navigating digital finance and emerging technologies. This program is suited for attorneys with a foundational understanding of financial regulation or technology law who seek to expand their expertise in the evolving legal, constitutional, and compliance frameworks governing digital assets and cryptocurrencies.

Learning Objectives:

1. Identify and Interpret Key Crypto Regulatory Frameworks
2. Analyze Constitutional Implications of Crypto Regulation
3. Assess the Impact of Recent Federal Policy Shifts under the Trump II Administration
4. Develop Practical Crypto Compliance and Risk Management Strategies
5. Evaluate Cross-Border and Multi-Jurisdictional Legal Challenges

Course Time Schedule:

Eastern Time: 6:30 PM - 7:30 PM
Central Time: 5:30 PM - 6:30 PM
Mountain Time: 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Pacific Time: 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM
Alaska Time: 2:30 PM - 3:30 PM
Hawaii-Aleutian Time: 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM

This course is also being presented on the following dates:

Monday, June 29, 2026
Monday, August 31, 2026
Monday, December 28, 2026

The "big picture" challenges to legal ethics principles posed by advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and related high-technology advances require consideration from attorneys. Stephan Hawking, the leading physicist of the latter 20th and early 21st centuries, predicted (until his death in 2018) that "artificial intelligence" would be mankind's "last invention." How near or far into the future is such a fate awaiting humanity? Will he be proven right, or will human intelligence (HI) manage to prevent such an apocalypse? How long will AI's "childhood" last? Can humans (or will humans) identify evolutionary changes warranting countermeasures so they don't become irreversible revolutionary changes for the worse rather than the better? Do not ethical duties of the legal profession necessarily include continuing vigilance regarding such technological changes to enable us to protect and preserve the tools (such as attorney-client confidentiality and privilege) needed for the legal profession to continue performing our most important mission: to protect liberty writ large?

Attendees will cover topics such as how AI was viewed in the past, how it has evolved in the present, and possible future implications. The types of AI and their classifications will be discussed. Participants will learn how the judiciary has treated AI and current questions and issues related to AI usage in the legal profession.

The format of this program combines the lecture method with the Socratic method, fostering extensive interactive participation and critical analysis of a broad range of issues relevant to the seminar's subject matter. This approach goes beyond merely chronological descriptions of specific topics and subtopics. In other words, the content of each workshop (and the order and extent of emphasis upon particular topics and subtopics) will be substantially influenced by the nature and extent of interactive participation regarding specific aspects thereof. Depending on the number of participants in a particular seminar, the format typically results in most, if not all, participants engaging in conversational-style, interactive discussions and analyses of specific topics during the seminar, and also permits interruptions, questions, challenges, and other contributions throughout the seminar. Think of collegially enjoyable and enlightening round-table discussions. It's a form of learning that involves thinking while interactively participating, rather than learning solely by listening (the latter of which is the lecture method).

This program is designed for any lawyer who understands: (a) that the very nature of the constitutional form of government is to protect the good of liberty from the evil of tyranny, (b) that, therefore, the primary mission of our profession is to protect liberty writ large within the bounds of the rule of law [in contrast to the rule of men (mankind)], and (c) that protecting such good from such evil requires our profession to be disciplined by understanding essential principles of science in seeking to prevent the latter from destroying the former.

Learning Objectives:

1. Refresh what should be every lawyer's common knowledge of unique aspects of the legal profession in contrast to all other professions, occupations, etc.: It's the effect of the Constitution's (and each state constitution's) vesting of "the judicial power" of the sovereign in its "Supreme Court" and its thereby incorporation of the evolutionary nature of the judiciary's common law inherent judicial power (i.e., sui generis power) to define, prescribe, and enforce educational, moral, ethical and civil standards for the practice of law and the status of lawyers as officers of the courts.
2. Understand that common law inherent judicial power (sui generis power) in an adversarial system created under common law, the supreme court of the sovereign (i.e., the U.S. Supreme Court and each state supreme court) creates structural and functional tools for the administration of justice – i.e., rules of evidence, burdens of proof, procedural rules, definitions of the practice of law, regulatory control over the conduct of attorneys, and the nature and scope of attorney-client confidentiality, attorney-client privilege, and attorney work-product. 
3. Examine how the judiciary generally encourages lawyers to utilize modern devices, programs, applications, and procedures, and in some contexts specifically requires the utilization of particular devices, programs, applications, and procedures while also requiring lawyers to utilize them in ways that comport with duties imposed by the judiciary upon lawyers.
4. Explore how lawyers' uses of AI and similar or related programs, applications and procedures intrinsically undermine the extent of privacy necessary for proper utilization of particular tools (such as attorney-client confidentiality, attorney-client privilege, and attorney work-product), and such undermining of privacy a fortiori interferes with, or jeopardizes, lawyers' abilities to utilize them in ways that comport with duties imposed by the judiciary upon lawyers. This creates a conundrum. 
5. Evaluate the significance of such a conundrum where privacy is undermined; lawyers must have sufficient scientific literacy to recognize the contexts in which technology can undermine or even negate efforts by lawyers to satisfy the legal and ethical duties imposed upon them by the judicial branch as "officers of the courts." 
6. Assess how the nature and ubiquity of technological threats to lawyers' ethical duties are such that efforts by individual lawyers to counter or negate such threats cannot succeed without overt and comprehensive regulatory measures by the courts to provide constitutionally effective countermeasures against such threats.

Course Time Schedule:

Eastern Time: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Central Time: 3:00 PM - 5:00 PM
Mountain Time: 2:00 PM - 4:00 PM
Pacific Time: 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM
Alaska Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM
Hawaii-Aleutian Time: 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM

This course is also being presented on the following dates:

Monday, April 6, 2026
Monday, April 13, 2026
Monday, April 20, 2026
Monday, April 27, 2026
Monday, May 4, 2026

In an era of rapid technological advancement, the practice of law is undergoing a profound transformation. This course is designed to equip attorneys with the practical skills and knowledge necessary to navigate this new landscape effectively. By focusing on real-world problem-solving and integrating cutting-edge AI tools, this program will empower attorneys to enhance their efficiency, deliver greater value to their clients, and stay ahead of the curve in a competitive legal market.

Attorneys should attend this program to become better equipped to address their clients’ needs when problem-solving, while saving time and creating happier clients. Attendees will gain confidence in their interactions with clients and the ability to bring meaningful resolution to matters. This program will also teach attendees how to leverage AI for legal research, case analysis, document review, and strategic planning. Attorneys will also learn actionable techniques and tips on the practical application of AI in their daily practice.

Attendees will gain a comprehensive understanding of modern problem-solving methodologies, with an emphasis on the practical application of artificial intelligence in legal practice. Participants will learn how to leverage AI for legal research, case analysis, document review, and strategic planning. Actionable techniques and tips on the practical application of AI in daily practice will be discussed.

This program is designed for attorneys at all stages of their careers, from newly admitted lawyers seeking to build a strong foundation to seasoned practitioners looking to update their skills. Whether a solo practitioner, in-house counsel, or part of a large firm, the principles and techniques taught in this course will be immediately applicable to an attorney’s daily practice. This program is particularly appropriate for those wanting to inject some creativity into (or re-invigorate) their approach to problem solving, and is intended for newer attorneys or experienced attorneys who may be new to transactional or in-house work.

Learning Objectives:

1. Define and analyze the basics of solving any problem.
2. Identify and apply a systematic framework for solving complex legal problems.
3. Implement a framework for success in one’s legal practice.
4. Identify, size up, and resolve the matter at hand.
5. Foster more positive interactions with clients while resolving legal matters effectively and efficiently.
6. Evaluate the steps and considerations when doing intake of new legal issues.
7. Navigate the landscape of AI tools available to legal professionals.
8. Utilize AI-powered platforms for efficient and comprehensive legal research and analysis, streamline document review, identify key information, and assess case strengths and weaknesses.
9. Develop strategies for integrating AI into legal practice to enhance productivity and client outcomes.

Course Time Schedule:

Eastern Time: 11:00 AM - 12:30 PM
Central Time: 10:00 AM - 11:30 AM
Mountain Time: 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM
Pacific Time: 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM
Alaska Time: 7:00 AM - 8:30 AM
Hawaii-Aleutian Time: 6:00 AM - 7:30 AM

This course is also being presented on the following dates:

Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
Tuesday, July 7, 2026
Tuesday, August 4, 2026

One of the two broad topics this seminar focuses on is Model Rule 8.4, which prohibits lawyers and law firms from engaging in invidious sexual discrimination. The other is sexual activity within the attorney-client relationship. Regarding the former, every lawyer ought to want to stay abreast of issues or standards involving sexual discrimination within the profession. Regarding the latter, even though most lawyers would say, "I'd never even consider, much less engage in, sexual activity with a client, so why should I take a seminar titled 'Sexual Ethical Issues'"? The ethically responsible answer would be "Even though you're certain you'd never engage In sexual activity with a client -- and thus have no need to learn about the 'ethics' or lack thereof with respect thereto, your ordinary, behavior, conduct or attitude may be construed by others as manifesting sexual overtures and, as a lawyer, you ought to be interested in knowing whether your profession is responsibly regulating sexual activity on the part of lawyers within their attorney-client relationships.”

The anti-discriminatory, anti-harassment aspect of the seminar focuses on ABA Model Rule 8.4 (or equivalent state-supreme-court rules), which defines "misconduct" as any conduct evincing "harassment or discrimination based on… sex …, sexual orientation, [or] gender identity." Those rules are relatively uniform from state to state, but of course, their interpretation is generally a state-law issue rather than a federal-law issue. The sexual activity aspect of the seminar focuses on ABA Model Rule 1.8(j) (or equivalent state-supreme-court rules) governing sexual conduct by a lawyer with (or towards) a client. The content of this latter category of Rules varies quite a lot from one state to the next, and several states have declined to adopt a rule specifically regulating sexual "activity."

The format of this program combines the lecture method with the Socratic method, fostering extensive interactive participation and critical analysis of a broad range of issues relevant to the seminar's subject matter. This approach goes beyond merely chronological descriptions of specific topics and subtopics. In other words, the content of each workshop (and the order and extent of emphasis upon particular topics and subtopics) will be substantially influenced by the nature and extent of interactive participation regarding specific aspects thereof. Depending on the number of participants in a particular seminar, the format typically results in most, if not all, participants engaging in conversational-style, interactive discussions and analyses of specific topics during the seminar, and also permits interruptions, questions, challenges, and other contributions throughout the seminar. Think of collegially enjoyable and enlightening round-table discussions. It's a form of learning that involves thinking while interactively participating, rather than learning solely by listening (the latter of which is the lecture method).

This program is designed for any attorney interested in ensuring a more equitable environment free from sexual discrimination.

Learning Objectives:

1. Refresh what should be every lawyer's common knowledge of unique aspects of the legal profession in contrast to all other professions, occupations, etc.: It's the effect of the Constitution's (and each state constitution's) vesting of "the judicial power" of the sovereign in its "Supreme Court" and its thereby incorporation of the evolutionary nature of the judiciary's common law inherent judicial power (i.e., sui generis power) to define, prescribe, and enforce educational, moral, ethical and civil standards for the practice of law and the status of lawyers as officers of the courts.
2. Understand that the supreme court of the sovereign (i.e., the U.S. Supreme Court and each state supreme court) creates structural and functional tools for the administration of justice from common law inherent judicial power (sui generis power) in an adversarial system created under common law, -- i.e., rules of evidence, burdens of proof, procedural rules, and regulatory control over the conduct of attorneys. 
3. Engage actively in the regulatory control over the legal profession generally and the conduct of lawyers individually, as the judiciary typically encourages lawyers to participate. Therefore, each attorney must keep abreast of such disciplinary and regulatory activities and, as much as possible, to actively participate (pro bono, of course) in and support such activities.
4. Explore the types of conduct by a lawyer that would constitute (or that might be construed as) harassment or unlawful discrimination regarding sex, gender, or orientation. Generally, there are not wide variations in the content (or interpretation) of the state-by-state versions of ABA Model Rule 8.4, defining as "misconduct" any conduct evincing "harassment or discrimination based on… sex …, sexual orientation, [or] gender identity."
5. Review types of conduct that would constitute (or that may be construed as) "misconduct" involving sexual activity with or towards a client under ABA Model Rule 1.8(j) or under varying state-by-state versions of such Rule (or in states which have declined to adopt any Rule specifically regulating the subject matter). 
6. Evaluate that any Rule or law governing "sex" and/or "sexual orientation" or "gender" ought to be construed per whatever is the current state of medical knowledge on matters such as "XY" and "XX" chromosomes, does the intrinsically pliable nature of terms such as "orientation" and "gender" thereby somehow render such chromosomal terminology pliable (rather than empirical, scientific descriptions of the biological status of males and females) even though the statistical variations (in XY and XX chromosomes) comprise incredibly tiny percentages of deviations from the norm? So, how should attorneys view deviations from that norm? For example, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, such deviations prohibit different treatment unless it is reasonably warranted in the context of such treatment. For example, the disqualification of a person with a severe peanut allergy from employment requiring proximity to peanuts would not constitute an illegal form of "discrimination." Could the XX or XY status of a lawyer warrant different treatment without such treatment being deemed violative of the Rule 8.4 prohibition against sexual discrimination?

Course Time Schedule:

Eastern Time: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Central Time: 3:00 PM - 5:00 PM
Mountain Time: 2:00 PM - 4:00 PM
Pacific Time: 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM
Alaska Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM
Hawaii-Aleutian Time: 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM

This course is also being presented on the following dates:

Tuesday, April 7, 2026
Tuesday, April 14, 2026
Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Tuesday, May 5, 2026